Vom Totschlag zur Strafvereitelung

From manslaughter to obstruction of justice — successful defence by MPP before Göttingen Regional Court

On 16.01.2024, lawyer Karl-Heinz Mügge was able to achieve a major defence success before the Göttingen Regional Court.

In the mans­laughter trial for the Ukrai­nian man killed in May 2023, the defen­dant repre­sented by lawyer Mügge was sentenced to two years’ impri­son­ment for obstruc­tion of justice, the execu­tion of which was suspended — although the public prose­cu­tor’s office had charged him with joint mans­laughter.

Even for expe­ri­enced criminal defence lawyers, the defence of capital offences regu­larly pres­ents a parti­cular chall­enge. Deve­lo­ping a compre­hen­sive, indi­vi­dual defence stra­tegy is extre­mely important.

On the one hand, this is due to the high threat of punish­ment for mans­laughter offences (e.g. life impri­son­ment for a murder offence, five years to life impri­son­ment in the case of mans­laughter or 10 years to life impri­son­ment in the case of robbery resul­ting in death).

On the other hand, there is also the inves­ti­ga­tive pres­sure that the prose­cu­tion autho­ri­ties are regu­larly under in the case of a homicide offence. For example, there are cases in which the accused are lite­rally pres­su­rised into making a state­ment by the inves­ti­ga­ting offi­cers.

In such cases, expe­ri­enced defence lawyers advise their clients all the more to make use of their right to remain silent — usually not only in the preli­mi­nary procee­dings, but also in the main hearing before the senten­cing court.

However, in view of the indi­vi­dual circum­s­tances of each case, such an approach is not appro­priate for every client. Rather, each constel­la­tion requires a speci­ally deve­loped defence stra­tegy that does not ignore the possi­bi­lity of actively invol­ving the client in the procee­dings.

In the case of the man who was killed in May 2023, for example, a very atypical defence stra­tegy was required. After inten­sive discus­sion and prepa­ra­tion, lawyer Mügge allowed the defen­dant to make a detailed state­ment on the alle­ga­tions of the offence before the regional court in December 2023 — with success!

The verdict clearly shows that it was worth taking the risk of the defen­dant making an inde­pen­dent state­ment and thus waiving his right to remain silent. On the last day of the trial, both the defence and the public prose­cu­tor’s office, the joint plain­tiff and the jury agreed that no act of murder by the defen­dant could be proven.

The client was only convicted of obstruc­tion of justice because he helped the perpe­trator — after the latter had repea­tedly threa­tened him — to leave the country and hide the body.

After the verdict, the defen­dant was able to leave the court as a free man after seven and a half months in custody.

Another defen­dant in these procee­dings was successfully repre­sented by lawyer Dr Anthea Pitschel last summer. The Göttingen public prose­cu­tor’s office was also inves­ti­ga­ting him for mans­laughter. Follo­wing a successful appeal against arrest, Dr Pitschel not only managed to have the man released from custody, but also to have the preli­mi­nary procee­dings dropped due to a lack of suffi­cient suspi­cion.

Similar Posts